Ask a Question(Create a thread) |
|
Why is this sentence in Past Subjuntive?This is the place for questions about conjugations, verb tenses, adverbs, adjectives, word order, syntax and other grammar questions for English or Spanish. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Why is this sentence in Past Subjuntive?
Hi, folks.
I appreciate all of the help found here. My question is: Why is this subordinate clause in the past subjunctive? My native speaking teacher wrote this. TIA. La policia advirtió a la gente que tuvieran cuidado. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Turn the question around: what else could it be in?
It's irrealis, because the hearers could choose to ignore the advice. And it can't be present tense because the action may already have occurred. Some verbs (can) take a dependent in the infinitive, but I don't think advertir is one of them, and I certainly can't think of any verb which takes *que + infinitive. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Grammatically, I agree with Pjt: The agreement with the verb in preterite can only take a past subjunctive.
Yet, there are reasons why the "companion" of "advirtió" may be something else than "tuviera*": 1.- When the speaker has in mind the situation that has all happened in the past. When the police warned of some risk to the people, and the risk is over now, then "tuviera" must be the only choice. But if the risk is still present now, the speaker's choice will likely be "tenga": · La policía advirtió a la gente que tenga cuidado.2.- Many people in South America (and lately, due to the influence of social networks in many other places), have ditched the past subjunctive and use the present subjunctive instead. So, they'll use "tenga", even if the risk is over and the situation has all happened in the past. · La policía advirtió a la gente que tenga cuidado.3.- The companion of the verb may be an infinitive ("tener"): · La policía advirtió a la gente tener cuidado.This is hard to explain, so I'll do it by parts: In grammar manuals, the rule is that if the same person performs two actions, then the first verb is conjugated and the second one is an infinitive. I was taught this is mostly a matter of style rather than a rule, because in colloquial usage, many sentences with the same subject have a subjunctive and a few sentences with different subjects take an infinitive; so I will try to explain as I learnt it. Consider these sentences: · Vine hoy para que (yo) no tenga que venir mañana.All of these sentences have the same subject performing two actions and the ones with the infinitive are far better than the ones with the subjunctive, because they're shorter, and offer no ambiguity in meaning. As for the sentences where there is more than one subject performing different actions, the normal formula is like the one in your example: · No creo que Juan sepa de coches.In all these cases, the first subject and the second one have a clear first action and a second action they're performing, so there is no confusion about whether to use an infinitive. Normally, when there are two subjects, but there is an infinitive instead of a subjunctive, it's easy to identify that both sentences have different meanings: · Los niños querían que abriera los regalos.So now, for the example: "La policía advirtió a la gente tener cuidado." Here the meaning of the sentence with an infinitive is clearly the same as when using a subjunctive, because the subject is tacit in the infinitive. When I think about the examples, it seems to me this is commonly done when the sentence implies some instruction, order or recommendation: · Es necesario que le digamos que se vaya.So that's why it can't only be "tuviera", although grammatically, it's the best choice. If you have questions, let me know. You might also find useful the discussions here and here. *I'm using "tuviera" instead of "tuvieran" because I prefer the agreement with "gente", which is a singular noun.
__________________
♪ ♫ ♪ Ain't it wonderful to be alive when the Rock'n'Roll plays... ♪ ♫ ♪ |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I need to remember that (from your quote above) an "Instruction, order, or recommendation" ALWAYS is in the subjunctive. Correct? Thanks. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I read more about it, and there are some verbs called "verbos de influencia", which are the ones used to persuade people of acting as one wishes. Some examples are: "ordenar", "sugerir", "convencer", "pedir", "autorizar", etc.
These verbs commonly are accompanied by the infinitive, or a subjunctive preceded by "que". The only challenge with these verbs is what preposition they take (or not), which has to be memorized, I'm afraid. -Convencí a mi esposo de arreglar la estufa. -Convencí a mi esposo de que arreglara la estufa. (I convinced my husband to fix the stove/that he fixed the stove.) -El profesor no permite comer en clase. -El profesor no permite que uno coma en clase. (The teacher doesn't allow to eat in class/that one eats in class.) -Está prohibido sentarse en el pasto. -Está prohibido que la gente se siente en el pasto. (It is forbidden to sit on the grass/that people sit on the grass.) -Les proponemos discutir juntos este asunto. -Les proponemos que discutamos juntos este asunto. (We propose to discuss this issue together/that we discuss this issue together.) -Juan estaba muy borracho. Tuvimos que impedirle manejar. -Juan estaba muy borracho. Tuvimos que impedirle que manejara. (Juan was too drunk. We had to stop him from driving/that he would drive.) -Sus padres la obligaron a estudiar Derecho. -Sus padres la obligaron a que estudiara Derecho. (His parents forced her to study Law/that she studied Law.)
__________________
♪ ♫ ♪ Ain't it wonderful to be alive when the Rock'n'Roll plays... ♪ ♫ ♪ |
Link to this thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Imperfect Past Tense vs. Preterit Past Tense | dwight.vj | Practice & Homework | 11 | July 29, 2016 08:18 PM |
Que + subjuntive | Esperar | Grammar | 2 | July 28, 2013 04:20 AM |
Subjuntive or indicative? | HarleyH | Grammar | 1 | April 25, 2013 03:09 PM |
How do I change this sentence from the simple present to the past perfect? | Yoodle15 | Grammar | 6 | January 24, 2013 07:36 PM |
Indicative/Subjuntive or both? | tacuba | Grammar | 6 | January 07, 2009 02:09 AM |