Ask a Question(Create a thread) |
|
Ser & Estar for Physical AppearanceThis is the place for questions about conjugations, verb tenses, adverbs, adjectives, word order, syntax and other grammar questions for English or Spanish. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ser & Estar for Physical Appearance
Hi,
I'm working through a couple of textbooks and I'd already worked through Ser and Estar in one of them and thought I understood when to use each of them. However I've just reached the subject in the other textbook and I've found some conflicting information. One textbook states to use Ser for physical attributes and states that despite the fact beauty can fade it generally does not change overnight. The other textbook when giving examples of when to use Estar, says Él está guapo, which is obviously means he is handsome. I'm sure you can understand my confusion so would anyone be able to shed some light on what is actually correct? Thanks, LJM |
Get rid of these ads by registering for a free Tomísimo account.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Although it's useful for having some basic notion about the difference between "ser" and "estar", the idea that one is for permanent situations and the other for changeable conditions is inaccurate, and sometimes even misleading.
"Ser" is used to talk about inherent attributes of the subject, and "estar" for things that aren't intrinsic to the subject. And although some attributes like beauty could be perceived as inherent to the person or object, they often involve a subjective perception. If the speaker doesn't think a person is especially goodlooking, but considers that they did something to look better, the verb "estar" is likely to be the chosen one. - María es hermosa. -> María has always been perceived as a beautiful woman. - María está muy guapa. -> Maybe I think she hasn't been cute all her life, but now she looks nice. - Roberto es delgado. -> I'm describing Roberto as slim man, maybe because I think that's just a part of him. - Roberto está delgado. -> Probably I met Roberto when was overweight, and now I see something happened to him that made him slim down. Added to the previous subjective perception, "estar" can also be used when a process has made things they are: - Estas tazas están rotas. -> Of course, this state will not change for the mugs, but something made them get broken, so it's their current state I'm describing. - Mi madre está enferma. -> This is one of those times when a condition can change, but even if I know my mother has no cure, I will always say "está", because there was a process that made her ill and that's her current situation. - El perro está muerto. -> That's something that will never change, but something happened that made the dog die. For more explanations about the uses of "ser" and "estar", you might want to take a look here.
__________________
♪ ♫ ♪ Ain't it wonderful to be alive when the Rock'n'Roll plays... ♪ ♫ ♪ |
Tags |
estar, ser, ser vs estar |
Link to this thread | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ser or Estar | er610 | Grammar | 7 | October 10, 2011 12:22 PM |
Ser and estar.... again.... | lingos | Grammar | 2 | November 20, 2009 06:59 PM |
Ser, Estar, AR, ER, IR | DaveG | Grammar | 22 | January 30, 2009 08:59 PM |
Spanish Estar vs ser / Pred vs imp & subjunctive | BlueOcean | Practice & Homework | 13 | January 21, 2009 09:58 PM |