Abortion

[Jessica]

I am starting yet another popular debate.

Are you pro-life or pro-choice?

lock if this is not allowed...


I am 100% pro-choice. It is the woman's choice 100% because it's her body. it's not murder because the so called "baby" isn't even a human being yet, unless the woman gets it when it's nearly fully developed.

[JPablo]

I am "pro-education".
A body is a body.
A being is a being.
I am pro-life too, but there are situations.
With the amount of contraceptive methods there are nowadays, if someone becomes pregnant unwillingly (or in case of violations) there are medical reasons to "abort". Otherwise, if each person was educated and knew what he/she was doing, the "problem" wouldn't exist.

[pjt33]

Originally Posted by JPablo

I am "pro-education".
A body is a body.
A being is a being.
I am pro-life too, but there are situations.
With the amount of contraceptive methods there are nowadays, if someone becomes pregnant unwillingly (or in case of violations) there are medical reasons to "abort". Otherwise, if each person was educated and knew what he/she was doing, the "problem" wouldn't exist.

Rape. "Violation" significa más "infringimiento".

[JPablo]

Ah, thank you...
(in a common register, right?)
Because Random House gives 5. sexual molestion, esp. rape.
And Oxford shorter also gives "violate: assault sexually; rape."
I take then that while "violation" can be understood in context, it is safer to use "rape".

[CrOtALiTo]

Really your thread is something special for the word.

I vote for the choice and I know everyone have the control over their body, I know that kind to experiments and new technology is for the save other life, I believe anyone have rights over a person.

[pjt33]

Originally Posted by JPablo

Ah, thank you...
(in a common register, right?)
Because Random House gives 5. sexual molestion, esp. rape.
And Oxford shorter also gives "violate: assault sexually; rape."
I take then that while "violation" can be understood in context, it is safer to use "rape".

I don't think that's at all common as a bare noun. "Sexual violation" as a noun phrase, yes.

[JPablo]

Thank you, Pjt33. Make sense.

[Chris]

I'm pro life. I believe that life begins at conception. I understand that there are medical reasons as in either one of these people are going to die or both. In my opinion the woman CHOSE when she had intercourse, and aborting a living child is no different than going to a play ground and blowing the kid's brains out with a revolver. It is murder. It seems that people are choosing to abort rather than simply using contraceptives.

[Jessica]

Originally Posted by Chris

I'm pro life. I believe that life begins at conception. I understand that there are medical reasons as in either one of these people are going to die or both. In my opinion the woman CHOSE when she had intercourse, and aborting a living child is no different than going to a play ground and blowing the kid's brains out with a revolver. It is murder. It seems that people are choosing to abort rather than simply using contraceptives.

but no one should be able to decide what a woman should do with their body.

[CrOtALiTo]

Originally Posted by Chris

I'm pro life. I believe that life begins at conception. I understand that there are medical reasons as in either one of these people are going to die or both. In my opinion the woman CHOSE when she had intercourse, and aborting a living child is no different than going to a play ground and blowing the kid's brains out with a revolver. It is murder. It seems that people are choosing to abort rather than simply using contraceptives.

Hello.

I'm agree with your commentary about it.
Because the pro life and the conception are quite the same, the life is definite for the people and the modern medicine, I don't know my bigger son has a illness named diabetes kind one, although he has the alternative about the implantation mother cells, and my other younger son would can has the opportunity to donate him a little of his cells, because himself has the chance to give him a new life, although that kind to thread is even a test for the new science.

I know it, the people are worrier for the people who are dying all the days for some kind of illness in the world, and they want to give a great advance in the currently medicine, for the beginning of all this thread is if you are agree with the kill other life although the person already been made of artificial way, it's doesn't matter, finally it's a life, and well the medicine finally will kills other life for gives a new organ or save the life of someone.

Then I'm upset in order that I need to understand the really of the life.
I'm don't agree with the fact of have to kill a life a little life for give more life and long life to other person, finally the person illness has lived a short or long time, now it's time of the new life.

Please it was my humble commentary.