Nfqufktc
November 05, 2025, 02:29 AM
¡Hola!
I would appreciate it if you could comment on my line of reasoning with regards to what makes sentences 1 and 2 exempt from the need to be complemented with the subjunctive.
The grammar books only said that it was a case of the verb of wanting / needing vs. the verb of having and they did not elaborate any further.
1. Una chica compró [FOCUSED] sombra para los ojos que le daba [FOCUSED] un aspecto vampiresco.
A girl bought an eye shadow that made her look like a vampire / gave her a vampiresque appearance.
2. Tenemos [FOCUSED] una computadora que funciona [FOCUSED].
We have a computer that works.
The antecedent is computadora, an electronic machine (one of the many) = NOT A TYPE
3. No había [FOCUSED] ningún lago allí que no fuera [DEFOCUSED] contaminado.
There was not a single / one lake there that was not polluted.
The antecedent is lago, but it is one that the speaker asserts did not exist at some time in the past.
4. Necesitamos [FOCUSED] una computadora que funcione [DEFOCUSED].
We need a computer that works.
The antecedent is computadora, as a type of computer, not a specific machine.
5. ¿Prefieres [FOCUSED] una novela en que el héroe siempre se case con [DEFOCUSED] la heroína?
Do you prefer novels in which / where the hero always marries the heroine?
The antecedent is novela, one of a class, not a specific title.
I venture to suggest the folllowing explanation:
Necesitar and preferir can be broadly grouped as emotive verbs. If it is so, it is to express his emotion that the speaker must use one of the four subjunctive forms (which are devoid of factual meaning), according to the temporal logic of the verb system, to complement his sentence.
Tener, on the other hand, is, for lack of a better term, a bipolar / black and white verb (so is comprar). One either has a computer or does not. Its semantics precludes any vacilation with emotions and, as such, it is freed from the need to be complemented with the subjunctive.
To refer to the definition for applying the subjunctive in an adjective clause:
The subjunctive is used in a subordinated adjective clause when that clause modifies an INDEFINITE, VAGUE, or NON-EXISTENT (UNREAL) antecedent.
So, in the sentence Tenemos una computadora que funciona
Una computadora is an UNIDENTIFIED example of the existing computers that we may claim to be ours / have borrowed / may have given away, etc. It is neither INDEFINITE, nor VAGUE, or nor NONEXISTENT. It is real and tangible.
I am looking forward to having your clarifications and corrections.
Thank you.
I would appreciate it if you could comment on my line of reasoning with regards to what makes sentences 1 and 2 exempt from the need to be complemented with the subjunctive.
The grammar books only said that it was a case of the verb of wanting / needing vs. the verb of having and they did not elaborate any further.
1. Una chica compró [FOCUSED] sombra para los ojos que le daba [FOCUSED] un aspecto vampiresco.
A girl bought an eye shadow that made her look like a vampire / gave her a vampiresque appearance.
2. Tenemos [FOCUSED] una computadora que funciona [FOCUSED].
We have a computer that works.
The antecedent is computadora, an electronic machine (one of the many) = NOT A TYPE
3. No había [FOCUSED] ningún lago allí que no fuera [DEFOCUSED] contaminado.
There was not a single / one lake there that was not polluted.
The antecedent is lago, but it is one that the speaker asserts did not exist at some time in the past.
4. Necesitamos [FOCUSED] una computadora que funcione [DEFOCUSED].
We need a computer that works.
The antecedent is computadora, as a type of computer, not a specific machine.
5. ¿Prefieres [FOCUSED] una novela en que el héroe siempre se case con [DEFOCUSED] la heroína?
Do you prefer novels in which / where the hero always marries the heroine?
The antecedent is novela, one of a class, not a specific title.
I venture to suggest the folllowing explanation:
Necesitar and preferir can be broadly grouped as emotive verbs. If it is so, it is to express his emotion that the speaker must use one of the four subjunctive forms (which are devoid of factual meaning), according to the temporal logic of the verb system, to complement his sentence.
Tener, on the other hand, is, for lack of a better term, a bipolar / black and white verb (so is comprar). One either has a computer or does not. Its semantics precludes any vacilation with emotions and, as such, it is freed from the need to be complemented with the subjunctive.
To refer to the definition for applying the subjunctive in an adjective clause:
The subjunctive is used in a subordinated adjective clause when that clause modifies an INDEFINITE, VAGUE, or NON-EXISTENT (UNREAL) antecedent.
So, in the sentence Tenemos una computadora que funciona
Una computadora is an UNIDENTIFIED example of the existing computers that we may claim to be ours / have borrowed / may have given away, etc. It is neither INDEFINITE, nor VAGUE, or nor NONEXISTENT. It is real and tangible.
I am looking forward to having your clarifications and corrections.
Thank you.