Difficult languages

[ElDanés]

I don't think the grammar of languages is the hardest to learn, as it simply requires lots of practice. What I think is hard is idioms and sayings, and alike, and to learn how real natives speak the language. I'm from Finland myself, so I know a lot of Finnish, and on some points it's very different from Danish, English or other languages. A funny thing, in my humble opinion, is that you say you're going into the toilet, and not on the toilet, when you're going for a pee (minä menen vessassa).

But it's true of course, the grammar is a factor. I have only briefly looked at Hungarian once, and I can't say if it's harder than Finnish or not. Personally do I think that some of the hardest languages to learn are Native American languages, or some other languages by indians (Mayan, etc.) They have a complex grammar-system, and many sentences have a bit of supernatural things in them, caused by their old religions, etc. Also, most of them are agglutinative languages, which can be quite confusing sometimes.

Escrito originalmente por Rusty

and Finnish (8)

15.

[María José]

Escrito originalmente por ElDanés

I don't think the grammar of languages is the hardest to learn, as it simply requires lots of practice. What I think is hard is idioms and sayings, and alike, and to learn how real natives speak the language. I'm from Finland myself, so I know a lot of Finnish, and on some points it's very different from Danish, English or other languages. A funny thing, in my humble opinion, is that you say you're going into the toilet, and not on the toilet, when you're going for a pee (minä menen vessassa).

But it's true of course, the grammar is a factor. I have only briefly looked at Hungarian once, and I can't say if it's harder than Finnish or not. Personally do I think that some of the hardest languages to learn are Native American languages, or some other languages by indians (Mayan, etc.) They have a complex grammar-system, and many sentences have a bit of supernatural things in them, caused by their old religions, etc. Also, most of them are agglutinative languages, which can be quite confusing sometimes.


15.

You made me think that even though the grammar of English is quite simple, my students (most of them are Spanish, but not all) have lots of problems with idioms and prepositions and with the fact that, in their opinion, English is not logical at all.
They also have great trouble understanding. We use films, soaps, documentaries... quite often, and most of them (and they are advanced students - C1 more or less in the European Framework) feel lost without the subtitles, even the ones who have lived in England or the States for a year or more still have problems understanding 100 %, mainly because of the pronunciation and intonation .
You also mentioned culture and religion, and that is true of modern languages too. When we watch comedies there are many jokes I have to explain or that they try to guess together, unless I've given some explanations beforehand, because most of them lack the cultural background or don't know the pronunciation of a brand, who a famous person is...
P.S. Just an afterthought: here in Spain most films both on telly and at the cinema are still dubbed.Most of my Latin American students are quicker at listening because in their countries they watch O.V.s with subtitles.

[ElDanés]

Escrito originalmente por María José

with idioms and prepositions and with the fact that, in their opinion, English is not logical at all.

I can only agree with that. I'm still facing lots of problems with idioms and prepositions. But reading a forum such as this one helps you learning it. Slowly you figure out where you use "on," "at," etc.

[Rusty]

I heard once that there were 8 Finnish noun cases, and I believed what I heard. With your help, and looking on-line, I now know that there are 15. Thanks, ElDanés!

[ElDanés]

You're welcome.

[María José]

I'm learning lots of things here too. And not only related to languages... I'm a tiny bit less scared of my computer now and I also have a lot of fun. Thanks, everybody.

I am 30 years old and wanted to learn chinese. Can you tell me what is the best way to learn it?

[Tomisimo]

Escrito originalmente por curadebt

I am 30 years old and wanted to learn chinese. Can you tell me what is the best way to learn it?

Please start your own thread in the other languages forum.

[CrOtALiTo]

Wlecome Curabet.

[chanman]

Escrito originalmente por Ramses

Well, there are 'only' 4 tones to master, and it's not THAT hard. Yes, learning the Hanzi can be a challenge, but it's also great fun when you get the hang of it. And yes, the vocab is totally different, but the grammar is just so straight-forward and at times easy, so that makes a lot better.


Depends on the languages. For example; French and Spanish. At the same time it'll confuse you. But for example Spanish and Turkish (like I do at the moment)? I think it's perfectly possible because the two languages are so completely different.

It depends on the teacher and student; Some are taught 4 (like in Mainland China), while others are taught 5 (like in Taiwan). Where 5 tones is taught, they consider words like ma, and ba, and the end of questions and sentences (In other words, particles), to have a "dot" tone. Also, when a word is repeated twice it also has a "dot" tone.

Oh, and if you think Mandarin is hard because of tones, trying learning Cantonese. 6.

Grammar of Mandarin is actually relatively easy; relatively little conjugation compared to Indo-European languages, no cases, and very easy to modify words, making them adjectives, nouns, adverbs, etc. The hardest would probably be the writing system, which requires the memorization of every single character. Chinese is also slightly phonetic though. For more complex characters, there is the part called the "radical", which gives the basic idea or meaning. Then the other part can help with pronounciation.

For example, 铃. The left side is the "metal" radical, while the right side itself (令) would be pronounced "ling". This character is also pronounced the same way ("ling"), but it means "bell", as a bell is made out of metal.
There are also "top" radicals, like in the word 宇 (yu). The top is the "protect" radical (宀， it is not a radical by itself, but is derived from the word 保 [bao]). The bottom (于) is pronounced "yu". This word together is also pronounced in the same way, but together with 宙，it means universe. (宇宙)

[chanman]

I made a mistake in my post. 宀, I meant, is not a character in and of itself. It is a radical, though. Sorry.

[CrOtALiTo]

Don't worry is normal when oneself does mistakes.

[chanman]

Escrito originalmente por CrOtALiTo

Don't worry is normal when oneself does mistakes.

Common mistake for Spanish-speakers learning English; sometimes they mix up does and makes because they are both "hacer" en español.
You "make" mistakes, not do them.

[brute]

Escrito originalmente por chanman

Common mistake for Spanish-speakers learning English; sometimes they mix up does and makes because they are both "hacer" en español.
You "make" mistakes, not do them.

Other languages do the same thing, French - faire, German - machen can both be translated as to do or to make!

[irmamar]

Both make-do and work-job are difficult to learn for Spanish speakers. I think that it's the same with ser-estar for English speakers. I always mix them up.

[bobjenkins]

Escrito originalmente por irmamar

Both make-do and work-job are difficult to learn for Spanish speakers. I think that it's the same with ser-estar for English speakers. I always mix them up.

Sí, por la gente quien está estudiando el español 'para/por' es muy difícil, porque en inglés tenemos un único significado 'for' Tambien, pienso que 'por' tiene más que 274739 significados me parece jeje

Pero finalmente creo que estoy empezando ententerlo

[CrOtALiTo]

Escrito originalmente por bobjenkins

Sí, por la gente quien está estudiando el español 'para/por' es muy difícil, porque en inglés tenemos un único significado 'for' Tambien, pienso que 'por' tiene más que 274739 significados me parece jeje

Pero finalmente creo que estoy empezando ententerlo

In English are there two meaning for the word Por is by and for any of the two words are acceptable for write in English, sometimes I struggled for decide which word I must to take in one text, but with the time I learnt that both words are acceptable and also meaning the same.

[chanman]

Estoy completamente de acuerdo - por y para son muy, muy difícil para comprender como usar para Anglohablantes (pues, para mi. No sé sobre otras personas). Por/para es mucho más difícil usar correctamente que ser/estar. Entendí como usar ser/estar muy rapidamente, pero hago errores algunas veces porque no estoy prestando atención. jeje.

[irmamar]

Para mí no hay dudas entre por y para

In a simply way, "por" expresses cause and "para", purpose:

Ha pasado por tu culpa.
Este libro está escrito por mí.

He traído este regalo para ti.
Aquí me tienes para lo que necesites.

Sometimes, they are interchangeable:

Hizo todo lo posible para / por aprobar el examen.
No sé por / para / hacia dónde tirar.

This is a very simple point of view but I hope it will be useful.

[chanman]

¡Muchísimas Gracias!
Voy a tratar recordar este consejo. Espero que me ayudará.

Escrito originalmente por irmamar

Para mí no hay dudas entre por y para

In a simple way, "por" expresses cause and "para", purpose:

Ha pasado por tu culpa.
Este libro está escrito por mí.

He traído este regalo para ti.
Aquí me tienes para lo que necesites.

Sometimes, they are interchangeable:

Hizo todo lo posible para / por aprobar el examen.
No sé por / para / hacia dónde tirar.

This is a very simple point of view but I hope it will be useful.

Una corrección pequeña. =]