Differences in U.S. and Mexico? - Page 2

La belleza de la comunicación verbal:thumbsup:

Yes commonly there're differences between both countries in the speaks way, in fact we have a style of accent very remarked when we speak in English.

That's also found in lunfardo in Argentina. I don't think that has to do with English influence, so I don't think that most of those examples are Spanglish, per se. Do you know the etymology of those expressions?

Does that come from Andalucian Spanish originally?

It's the same as the vosotros forms given in books minus the "i" (sois > sos), and minus the -d in imperatives.

When I look at the atlas it appears to me that Mejico is firmly in the contintent of North America, yet many norteamericanos hotly dispute this, saying it's in Central America. I like to ask people "There are two countries called 'The United States' in North America, can you name them?"

They're baffled when I answer "Los Estados Unidos de Mejico"! They usually offer Canada.

What's your opinion?

I was taught that North America ends at the border of Panama and Colombia. Central America is a region in southern North America. I was also taught that, although Mexico shares similarities with Central America, it is not technically Central America. Central America starts south of the border of Mexico in the country of Guatemala and ends at the southernmost point of Panama.

Mexico should always be spelled with a x not a j at least on the western side of the Atlantic.

I agree with Poli...i am not sure if some americans say that...

But good questions!

I would like to add: Can you name which country or who could be called "norteamericanos/north americans"?

:)

¿Los yanquis?

Why not Canada or Mexico too?

;)

Estados Unidos Mexicanos is the official name of the nation. ;)

Oh yes, you are also Estado Unidenses. :)

I live in the United States of America, and never have I heard a single person say that Mexico is not part of North America. The first, and only time I heard that some people consider Mexico to be part of Central America was on Wikipedia talking about some UN classification system that only the UN uses. However, sometimes people use the term North America when they need to talk about the US and Canada collectively. E.g. North American English, which obviously does not include the English spoken in Mexico, or Greenland. That doesn't mean that they think that Mexico is in Central America, though (or Greenland either, lol.)

It doesn't prove that they think Mexico is a part of Central America at all. It's just because nobody in the United States of America refers to Mexico as the United States of Mexico. It's always just called Mexico. Heck, I had no idea about its official name until I started studing Spanish. But I would never refer to it as the United States of Mexico when speaking English. Asking people from here that question is about as silly as asking them "True or False: there's an Oriental Republic in South America", or "Did you know, that Wales is in Australia?"

And Provincias Unidas del Río de la Plata is one of the two official names of República Argentina, copying predating names: the Dutch Republic (Provincias Unidas) and United States (of America, you know, stars and stripes).

Mexico is both in North and Central America (they are divided by the Isthmus of Tehuantepec), unless you divide America à la Gondwana/Laurasia in which case all Mexico is in North America as there's no a central one.

Sí tenés razón. But it could never be considered to be only in Central America, like Sancho Panther implied.

Maybe after NAFTA treated was signed people has abandoned misconceptions in the States, but I can assure you that Mexico being part of Central America was massively held by people all around USA by 40's, 50's and 60's. Not only that, all the rest of America was either like Mexico or like Cuba or Puerto Rico. My parents sweated blood trying to explain to every kind of people there how it is actually during the time they lived in Boston, by the end of the fifties, before my birth. I keep a "long play" -Nat King Cole en Español- as a memento of those mythical times. All the songs are country Mexican sung with a hideous accent. But I suppose everything changes. My parents also took the plane to Miami and visited a lot of places before arriving to Boston. In some regions they had to travel by bus lumped together other white skins, all of them segregated from black people.

Well, the notion of Mexico not being part of North America was definitely abandoned. Although I'm very embarrased to admit that a lot of people here still are completely ignorant about what Central and South America are like. It's because there is so little about it taught in schools. Many people here know little about Canada and Mexico, let alone Central and South America. I know few people that could name a prime minister of Canada, let alone the current prime minister of Canada. It's very embarrasing. Everything I learned from Central and South America is from travel books that I read recently, after getting interested in the Spanish language. I knew nothing before. (So embarrasing to admit...:worried:)

Los estadoundenses que no saben los limites de centro-américa o que centro-américa es una región de norte américa son personas que nunca aprendieron lo que les enseñaron en la escuela. Aunque conozco un montón de américanos bobos y palurdos, estaría un gran error caracterizarnos todos así.

Yo me refería a los '50 ¿Tú viviste los '50?

Con respecto a Cole, yo hablo de lo que aprendí por experiencia y con el castellano como lengua materna. Claro que si presentan un disco lleno de mariachis éste tendrá mucho éxito ... donde abundan los mariachis. No te dejes llevar por las noticias de "ser un gran éxito" que preceden al lanzamiento del "éxito" -que es el "¡llame ya!" de todas las épocas- y que ponderan de rebote al circunstancial editor patasucia de Wikipedia, que sólo escribe de cosas importantes, como ser "grandes éxitos".

Lo del hideous accent mejor ni hablemos ¡Alguien de la misma lengua materna del cantante aludido asegura que no! ¡Guau, qué evidencia!

En última instancia, todo se reduce a que Cole ya era una figura de algún modo popular y mucha gente pagó por oirlo cantar de una manera que pudiera -a duras penas- entender.

Me iba a entretener explicando el ritmo tónico anglo del acento de Cole entre muchas otras cosas, pero todo se reduce siempre a lo mismo: De un lado de la balanza Latinoamerica, del otro, un minúsculo átomo del mundo anglosajón: Cole. La propia estructura de tu respuesta y mi contra-réplica representa exactamente lo que estábamos hablando. Quod erat demostrandum.

Wow, you lived in the 1950s? I knew you were older, but I assumed you were like 30. Didn't you say you weren't around in the 50s? Is that your current picture? Oh, and why did you use tú? I thought in Argentina only vos was used. Or were you writing in neutral Spanish? Is that common to do in Argentina?

Seriously, or was that a joke? If so, then there is no way of unambiguously referring to this country or its inhabitants in Spanish. If I say I'm norteaméricano, then I could be from this country or Canada or Mexico, and if I say I'm estadounidense, then I could be from this country or Mexico. I guess I'll just have to say I'm from north of Mexico, but South of Canada. And what was that other phrase, that was like "from the other place"? Is it Soy del otro lado or something like that?

¿Cuál pregunta querés que te conteste primero?:rolleyes::p
You also left out the emoticon with the polygraph.

Read again all the thread, both English and Spanish.

Ok so you were born sometime between the late 1950s and the present day.
As for the other question, I couldn't find the answers. Maybe I didn't understand everything.
-¿Es tu actual foto?
-¿Porqué has usado "tú"?
Eh?

Oh and I looked up Nat Cole: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nat_Cole