Spanish language learning forums

Spanish language learning forums (https://forums.tomisimo.org/index.php)
-   Grammar (https://forums.tomisimo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   Why are some letters silent in English....? (https://forums.tomisimo.org/showthread.php?t=13678)

Why are some letters silent in English....?


Gavinie August 18, 2012 05:20 AM

Why are some letters silent in English....?
 
why are some letters silent in English....? For example, In the word "walk", l is silent. Can someone tell me why...?

Perikles August 18, 2012 06:33 AM

I'm no expert, but the general reason is that the English vowel length is extremely variable. With only 5 vowels (ignoring y) these are used to represent 14 (?) different sounds, so something has to be there to determine exactly which vowel is meant.

for example:

hat

That 'a' is short, there is no reason for it to be anything else.

hate

Here, the 'e' is there to express the fact that the 'a' is long. The 'e' is not pronounced.

Another mechanism is a double consonant:

bitter

The double 't' indicates that the 'i' is short

biter

With only one 't' the 'i' is long. The extra 't' in bitter is not pronounced.

As for walk, the vowel sound is somewhere between 'a' and 'o', and this is expressed by inserting the 'l'. Same with half, calf etc. (I'm not to sure about this explanation)

Spanish has far fewer vowel sounds, so the a,e,i,o and u are sufficient to define them all without help from unpronounced letters.

Does that help for a start? :)

wrholt August 18, 2012 08:06 AM

Perikles has excellent examples, and I agree with his general statement that many spelling conventions often signal (or used to signal) a particular vowel quality.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perikles (Post 127429)
As for walk, the vowel sound is somewhere between 'a' and 'o', and this is expressed by inserting the 'l'. Same with half, calf etc. (I'm not to sure about this explanation)

The l+[consonant] convention does work to some degree, but it isn't as reliable in North American English as it is in British Received Pronunciation.

Usually "a(u)lk" is the closest to 'o' (walk, talk, balk, caulk).

Usually "alm" has the same vowel sound as the first syllable of "father" (alm, balm, calm, palm, psalm).

In a couple of regions, and especially in eastern Massachusets, some people with strong local accents pronounce "calf", "half", "can't", "bath" and a few other words with a sound that is closer to the first syllable of "father", but in most of North America these words have the same sound as the word "hat".

pjt33 August 18, 2012 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perikles (Post 127429)
I'm no expert, but the general reason is that the English vowel length is extremely variable. With only 5 vowels (ignoring y) these are used to represent 14 (?) different sounds, so something has to be there to determine exactly which vowel is meant.

It's not just length: it's also the position in the mouth. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPA_vowel_chart_with_audio . The horizontal axis is how far forward or back in the mouth the narrowest obstruction formed by the tongue is, and the vertical axis is how open the mouth is.

Counting the number of vowel sounds in English is difficult. Wikipedia lists 27 lexical sets which show vowel variation, including diphthongs. However, every dialect merges some of them (although not the same ones). See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interna...glish_dialects


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.