Especially and specially

Especially and specially
 

I've never been able to tell the difference between especially and specially so I tend to use them indiscriminately and cross my fingers for luck. Any tips?:confused:

I always use specially. I didn't know especially exists.
greetings :D

Lucky you...:D So far, it has saved you a lot of brain-racking.

They are very similar, but there is a small difference. For example you can say, She treats her friends specially.:thumbsup: It would be incorrect to say, She treats her friends especially:thumbsdown:. But you can say She treats her friends especially well:thumbsup:
You can say, The meal was made specially:thumbsup:
You cannot say, The meal was made especially:thumbsdown:
but, you can say, The meal was made especially for you:thumbsup:

This may be the rule but please correct me if I'm wrong, Rustu and other language people:
Specially works best as an adverb.
Especially works best as an adjective or when followed by a prepositional phrase or as an auxilliary adverb.

I don't think any of both especially and specially is an adjective. I think both are adverbs. On the phrases you gave, Poli, both work like adverbs.

The adjectives would be: special / especial.
The adverbs: specially / especially.

If there is a difference between these two words (which I don't have a clue about) it must be because they mean different things or they are used in different contexts. Anyway, I'm more of the opinion that they mean the same.

For the moment, I don't see the difference.

So far I've never been able to see it myself either, even though it's explained in grammar books and I've asked different people several times.:)

Thanks, Poli. But I'm still clueless. I'll read your explanation again when I have more time.

Alfonso, please review my examples. The ones with thumbs up are correct. Review their roles as a part of speech. You should be able to see that specially and especially have a different gramatical function and perhaps adjective is not the
term. Auxiliary adverb is better (an adverb to embellish another adverb like muy) may be a better term.

Think of especially as something similar to very. The word specially does not correspond to very--especially does.

The comparison between especially and very did help. :thumbsup:

The word especially, always used as an adverb, means:
to an unusual or exceptional degree (This building is especially large.)
to single out one among a range (They were all winners, especially Joe.)
chiefly (There are many great violinists, especially men.)
for a specific or particular purpose (This brush, especially designed for removing pet hair, makes a great gift.)

The adverb specially means:
for a special or particular purpose, person, or occasion
(The program was specially for children.)
(This brush, specially designed to remove pet hair better than any other pet hair remover, makes an exceptional gift.)
(The especially tall building had specially designed turbolifts to carry passengers to the higher floors more quickly.)

As you can see, the last definition of especially and the only definition of specially are quite similar. This is probably why there is a great deal of confusion between the words. As Poli pointed out, however, there are certainly times when they can't (properly) be switched. It's improper to say, "The building was specially tall," for example.

Normally one says that if you don't know which one to use, use especially. It's more common than the other, so the chances that it will fit is bigger. Note that this is not a rule, but just a little help.

Thanks Rusty for being thorough and correcting me. It's an adverb not an adjective. An example of how especially is used as an auxiliary adverb (like the word very) , and specially is not is Rusty's final sentece in the above quote. It's best to used especially if the sentence is followed by a prepostitional phrase. (the suit made especially for you)

The conclusion I get is that especially doesn't mean very.

And I don't think auxiliary adverb is a proper term for especially, since in the examples you gave once works modifying another adverb (2. especially well), and once works modifying a verb (4. made especially). The conclusion is that it works both, as much linked to an adverb as linked to a verb, as any other adverb.

Anyway, I had never heard before of the term auxiliary adverb, and Google only gives 84 entries for it, not all of them related to this subject.

<snip>

So, the question is how to distinguish when to use especially or specially when it means for a special or particular purpose, person or occasion, as it's partially the same as for a specific or particular purpose.

My conclusion is that when it means specifically you can use both.

And what about the adjectives? I guess special and especial work the same as their related adverbs. Am I right?

I admit that it's hard to distinguish the two adverbs when they mean for a special or particular purpose and for a specific or particular purpose. Here I almost always choose especially.

As far as the adjective forms, the former is used almost exclusively in American English. I've never heard anyone say especial.

This may be an invented concept all language is invented. I did not acuñar this concept, but thanks for the compliment.

When especially describes the adverb it is auxiliary much the way very (muy) is. If another word for auxiliary suits you, find it and use it. The word specially doesn't fulfill that function as well. Auxiliary means help it helps discribe the main adverb or adjective.
(He is especially tall. He works especially well.) In this function the
word especially (like very) doesn't stand on its own. It supports a principal adverb or adjective and is therefore auxiliary..
I will repeat especially should be used when it is followed by a prepositional phrase.
Feel free to google yourself silly and find 84 entries or 184 entries or 184,000 entries. It doesn't matter. What I've written makes perfect sense.

<snip>

Muchas gracias por tu explicación. Está todo realmente claro. Gracias de nuevo.

I think Poli's and Rusty's explanations clear this up pretty well, especially post #10 :)

Auxilliary adverbs don't exist as a existing, defined, agreed-upon grammatical category, but on the other hand, what poli means is understandable- he's describing how one adverb is used to modify another adverb and thus auxilliary adverb as a description and not a canonical grammatical category makes perfect sense.

Apparently the term auxiliary adverb confused some so I did some research to find out the technical word for the unique function which the word especially and the word very (when used as a adverb) serve.
The term is particularizer adverb http://www.ucl.ac.uk/internet-grammar/glossary/p.htm.
These adverbs function differently from other types of adverbs, and need to be categorized separately. Although they are auxiliary by function, particularizer is the canonical word -- a word I've never seen before.