Ask a Question(Create a thread) |
|
Accusative pronoun vs. The accidental reflexive construction!Grammar questions– conjugations, verb tenses, adverbs, adjectives, word order, syntax, etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Accusative pronoun vs. The accidental reflexive construction!
http://spanish.stackexchange.com/que...-constructions
In above site, it has written about the "accusative pronoun": example: Se me cayó. This element "me" is used to "accuse" somebody of being "guilty" of that. another examples: Se me cayó el libro. Se te perdió la mochicla. Now see what is written in another site about "Se with Unplanned Occurrences" or "The accidental reflexive construction": http://www.elearnspanishlanguage.com...reflexive.html The accidental reflexive construction indicates that the action was unintentional. In addition, because the subject is only referred to by an indirect object pronoun, this construction gives the sense that the subject is not to blame - he or she had nothing to do with the accident. examples: Se le cayó la pluma. ¿Se te perdieron las llaves? Now I confused which is correct? According to first site information I understood that Indirect object pronoun is used to "accuse" somebody of being "guilty" of doing action. So I conclude the action of that one is intentionally and not accidentally. According to second site the action is done accidentally. which one is correct? Maybe,I should say indirect object pronoun in passive se construction indicates somebody that is guilty of doing an action accidentally?? |
Get rid of these ads by registering for a free Tomísimo account.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dear Rusty, do you mean that:
"se" in the mentioned sentences is "direct object pronoun" in addition to "passive se" construction? and "accusative pronoun" is "direct object pronoun" not only in active voice but also in passive voice? Do you have "direct object pronoun" in passive voice? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry, what I wrote above about 'se' being a direct object is incorrect.
The 'accusative pronoun' and the 'direct object pronoun' are one in the same, but 'se' can never be used as a direct object pronoun. The sentences you wrote in the first post are all examples of the accidental 'se'. Not one of the sentences has a direct object in it. The 'se' is usually thought of, in English at least, as a reflexive pronoun. The action of the verb is reflected back on the subject. The indirect object pronoun is representing the person acted upon. |
![]() |
Link to this thread | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can I Omit reflexive pronoun in spatial situations? | arnoldsg72 | Grammar | 5 | September 22, 2014 04:43 PM |
Construction | Glen | Vocabulary | 3 | July 22, 2013 10:56 AM |
Reflexive verbs that admit impersonal reflexive construction | Coffee Kitten | Grammar | 13 | September 25, 2012 09:36 PM |
Reflexive Pronoun Question | Solidaridad | Grammar | 14 | April 23, 2012 10:23 AM |
Placement of "se" (reflexive pronoun) | Yoodle15 | Grammar | 1 | December 20, 2011 07:36 AM |