Verbs ending in "-guir"

[chileno]

Originally Posted by laepelba

Oooh! I love theta!! (0) See - you're becoming more mathematical!!

No, that's not theta. It's a scratched (crossed out text) zero. (it was itchy)

[laepelba]

Originally Posted by chileno

No, that's not theta. It's a scratched (crossed out text) zero. (it was itchy)

I know how you made it ... but however you came up with it, it's still THETA!! (Perikles, jump in here any time!)

[Perikles]

Originally Posted by laepelba

Oooh! I love theta!! (0) See - you're becoming more mathematical!!

Originally Posted by laepelba

(Perikles, jump in here any time!)

Thanks. I tell you what - here is a mathematical challenge to keep you (and Malila?) quiet for some time. Between the limits of plus and minus infinity, find the integral with respect to x of e to the power of minus x squared. (Sorry, I can't express it otherwise in text form, but it should be unambiguous) (I have done it, by the way)

[laepelba]

Originally Posted by Perikles

Thanks. I tell you what - here is a mathematical challenge to keep you (and Malila?) quiet for some time. Between the limits of plus and minus infinity, find the integral with respect to x of e to the power of minus x squared. (Sorry, I can't express it otherwise in text form, but it should be unambiguous) (I have done it, by the way)

No thank you ... it's been over 20 years since I've done any calculus. I could probably scratch out your problem, but would rather study "ser" and "estar".

[Perikles]

Originally Posted by laepelba

I could probably scratch out your problem

I bet you can't.

[laepelba]

Originally Posted by Perikles

I bet you can't.

I'm not one of those who is motivated by dares....... Back to "ser" y "estar".

[Perikles]

Originally Posted by laepelba

I'm not one of those who is motivated by dares....... Back to "ser" y "estar".

*sigh* cop-out. estoy muy decepcionado.

[AngelicaDeAlquezar]

@Perikles: Quiet?!
But you'll be disappointed twice:
-x^2 implies imaginary numbers, and I've never done those with integrals.

[Perikles]

Originally Posted by AngelicaDeAlquezar

@Perikles: Quiet?!
But you'll be disappointed twice:
-x^2 implies imaginary numbers, and I've never done those with integrals.

no imaginary numbers involved, but never mind. Ser and estar are more important here *sigh*

[laepelba]

Originally Posted by Perikles

no imaginary numbers involved, but never mind. Ser and estar are more important here *sigh*

Not more important ... simply better use of my time....

[AngelicaDeAlquezar]

@Perikles: You're so right!! I haven't solved complicated maths for a very long time... I'll send you a PM to stop the off-topic.

[laepelba]

Originally Posted by AngelicaDeAlquezar

@Perikles: You're so right!! I haven't solved complicated maths for a very long time... I'll send you a PM to stop the off-topic.

This is off-topic!!??

[AngelicaDeAlquezar]

No, si distingues los diferentes temas que se han seguido después de conseguir una lista de pronunciaciones de la "g suave" y la "g fuerte", irguiendo la cabeza para proseguir a resolver un problema matemático.


It's just a shame that I didn't conjugate all the verbs.

[laepelba]

Originally Posted by AngelicaDeAlquezar

No, si distingues los diferentes temas que se han seguido después de conseguir una lista de pronunciaciones de la "g suave" y la "g fuerte", irguiendo la cabeza para proseguir a resolver un problema matemático.


It's just a shame that I didn't conjugate all the verbs.

[Perikles]

Originally Posted by AngelicaDeAlquezar

No, si distingues los diferentes temas que se han seguido después de conseguir una lista de pronunciaciones de la "g suave" y la "g fuerte", irguiendo la cabeza para proseguir a resolver un problema matemático.


It's just a shame that I didn't conjugate all the verbs.

conjugar almost worked as well.