Ask a Question(Create a thread) |
|
Is it ever required to use gerunds?Grammar questions– conjugations, verb tenses, adverbs, adjectives, word order, syntax, etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
Get rid of these ads by registering for a free Tomísimo account.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, it's required by several reasons:
As Wrholt explains, it reduces ambiguity and is necesary in order to create coumpound foms and for other cases. Many teachers make the mistake to say "don't use gerunds in Spanish", when they should say "don't abuse of gerunds in Spanish". 1) They are needed (never an infinitive) behind some verbs as "seguir", "proseguir" or "continuar". Also, they change the meaning of "ir" and "venir". Continuó avanzando. Siguió riéndose. Prosiguieron disparando. Vino a cantar ![]() 2) Compund forms = Always work equal to English, but in Spanish they're utilized 20-30% less; especially when referring to future. "Veía" is equal to "estaba viendo" "Cantaré esta noche" better than "estaré cantado esta noche". 3) Explicative gerunds = Many times work equal to English, but it's not recommend to use them so much. English speakers and also natives in Spanish make the error to employ them when referring to a future/consequent action. It's never correct. Abatieron el avión, muriendo mil personas. ![]() Abatieron el avión y murieron mil personas. ![]() 4) Specificative gerunds = They don't work as in English. Actually, their equivalent are -nte adjetives. A pleasure. |
![]() |
Link to this thread | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the preposition "de" required in this sentence? | Liquinn3 | Grammar | 7 | September 26, 2013 12:49 PM |
Why is "el" required in one sentence, but not the other? | Liquinn3 | Grammar | 1 | May 23, 2013 07:46 PM |
Gerunds and Present Participles | laepelba | Grammar | 22 | January 18, 2010 01:13 PM |
Gerunds vs. Participles in Spanish | satchrocks | Grammar | 6 | June 16, 2009 06:07 AM |