Ask a Question(Create a thread) |
|
Geometry homework - accuracy checkTalk about anything here, just keep it clean. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
Get rid of these ads by registering for a free Tomísimo account.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another good catch^
Fazor is right about number 2. A 3:4:10 ratio cannot be correct because it would not be a triangle. One of the triangle rules is that the sum of any two sides must be greater than the third side. A 3:4:10 ratio would not pass this rule. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
oh. well we got it on Tuesday last week, so yeah. I just finished it today. it was hard, but I finished it. most of them require pictures, though, so I won't be able to let you check them.
Here's another one: The scale of a map and the distance between two points on the map is given. Find the actual distance between the locations represented by the points. Scale: 4 in. : 1 mi. Map distance: 10.5 inches Is this right, what I did? 4 in/1 mi = 10.5 in/x mi 4x = 10.5 x = 2.625 mi |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Actually, it's not.
X is the scalar (or whatever it's called). You know that 4 inches is a (1) mile, so that's the fact you want to work with first. It's 4X = 1, or x = .5 (miles). Then it's a simple matter of multiplying the distance between two points (10.5) by X. So, you approached the problem correctly, but you used the wrong number to find X. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not a mathematician, but I don't see why is not OK what jchen did.
It's a "regla del tres"
__________________
History, contrary to popular theories, "is" kings and dates and battles. Small Gods Terry Pratchett |
![]() |
Link to this thread | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Geometry Homework | Jessica | General Chat | 2 | March 02, 2009 05:57 PM |
Sentence check | cmon | Practice & Homework | 10 | January 15, 2009 03:33 PM |
Check my translation? | cmon | Practice & Homework | 10 | December 16, 2008 04:20 PM |
please check my grammar | pescamos | Grammar | 1 | July 24, 2006 12:04 AM |
CHECK IT OUT!!! | Mr Crow | General Chat | 0 | May 03, 2006 01:53 AM |